Subscriber Login
 Username:
 Password:
 
Forgot Password?
 
New User? Sign up
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Wall Street Bailout: A Crisis Far From Over
VSAPAC, Singapore - 22 September 2008 - The 700bn bailout plan for the country’s financial institutions to curb turmoil on the financial markets would allow the government to buy the non-performing assets of any US institution for the next two years, raising the legal ceiling on the national debt from $10.6 trillion to $11.3 trillion. The plan is aimed at restoring confidence in the financial system by allowing US institutions to transfer their bad debt to the government.
The issue now is to what extent the policy makers can take further, decisive action to fundamentally and comprehensively address the root cause of the financial system’s stresses. The focus will be on the effectiveness of the federal government’s plans to implement a program to remove these illiquid assets that are weighing down the financial institutions and threatening the global economy. The proposal to create a ¬government vehicle to take on the toxic assets in the financial system is the core of the strategy put forward by Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke to turn round the financial crisis.
A government-sponsored vehicle can help deal with a situation in which investors fear banks do not have enough capital to cover credit losses and banks cannot raise enough new capital from private sector sources. The government entity can address this by purchasing problem assets from banks, giving them more capital to finance their portfolios of problem assets, or both. There are still intriguingly outstanding questions as to the type of assets the government-backed entity accepts; including the level of simplicity (or complexity) of the credit securities to add onto the portfolio and at what price. The investment horizon and the manner in which the assets are to be disposed of and the process of valuing the securities also need to be addressed.
If the government acquires assets at the going distressed market price, the incentive for banks to participate is limited and the transaction might leave them with a ¬capital hole. If the government pays more than current market prices, the taxpayer will appear to be subsidising the banks. One way to get round this is for the government to acquire assets at today’s prices but offer banks a share of any upside.
The political negotiations on the rescue plan, which followed a week of unprecedented stress in global financial markets, envisage the most extensive peacetime expansion of the role of government in the financial system since the Great Depression and appeared to many to mark the end of an era of Reaganite deregulation. In addition, the Bush administration has announced a blanket guarantee on all money market mutual funds, in an effort to curtail a brewing crisis in the $3,500bn (€2,422bn) sector. The Federal Reserve announced new plans to support liquidity in the mutual fund sector.
Upon the announcement last week, stock markets around the world staged huge rallies as the US authorities moved towards agreement on a programme of government intervention that would put hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayers’ money at risk in an effort to quell the credit crisis. Shanghai surged 9.5 per cent, in the biggest daily gain for seven years, to 2,075.091. Hong Kong ’s Hang Seng gained 9.6 per cent to 19,327.73, breaking a seven-day losing streak. In London the FTSE 100 had its biggest daily gain in its 24-year history, jumping 8.8 per cent, while in New York the S&P 500 closed up 4.0 per cent, having risen 4.3 per cent on Thursday. The rallies in London and the US were partially fuelled by bans on short-selling in financial stocks announced on Thursday night.

To access this module plus a host of other benefits in the portal, you need to have a basic subscription package. Please write in to research@vsapac.com to subscribe.

 
 
Powered By: Crafty Syntax